Re: [BUGS] postgresql 7.3.2 bug on date '1901-12-13' and '1901-12

2003-08-21 Thread ir. F.T.M. van Vugt bc.
> > > Hmm, I just got my machine to give a similar failure mode with > > > a slightly wacky input. Will you allow me to add to this wackyness with the following on CVS tip from this morning: free4testing=# select version(); version ---

Re: [BUGS] multiple exception definition in pg_type.h -> error compiling postgres support in Qt with gcc v3.2 (SuSE 8.1)

2002-10-16 Thread ir. F.T.M. van Vugt bc.
> > May I ask why you don't want to go with something like: > > #define DESCR(x) typedef int postgresql_foo_bar > > Because it doesn't work. > $ cat z.c > typedef int postgresql_foo_bar; > typedef int postgresql_foo_bar; > $ gcc -c z.c > z.c:2: redefinition of `postgresql_foo_bar' > z.c:1: `postgr

Re: [BUGS] multiple exception definition in pg_type.h -> error compiling postgres support in Qt with gcc v3.2 (SuSE 8.1)

2002-10-16 Thread ir. F.T.M. van Vugt bc.
Tom Lane writes: > That's hard to believe; I think it's Qt that's doing something strange > here. As a newbie on the list, I'm sorry I have to disagree with you, Tom... ;) The fact that PostgreSQL dissolves stuff into something like: #include extern int errno; extern int errno; was more of a