Re: [BUGS] ERROR: invalid page header in block 502758 of relation base/16388/16403

2009-09-17 Thread fous velkej
t see any solution and if you can't see any solution either, i'm going to reinit the db :) fous 2009/9/17 Tom Lane : > fous velkej writes: >> ok, so i did reindexing ending with following error >> proxylog=# REINDEX TABLE user_record ; >> ERROR:  concurrent insert

Re: [BUGS] ERROR: invalid page header in block 502758 of relation base/16388/16403

2009-09-16 Thread fous velkej
HINT: Please REINDEX it. ok, so i did reindexing ending with following error proxylog=# REINDEX TABLE user_record ; ERROR: concurrent insert in progress what should i do now? i think it's not the problem of hw thanks for help fous -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgre

Re: [BUGS] ERROR: invalid page header in block 502758 of relation base/16388/16403

2009-09-16 Thread fous velkej
e header in block 502758 of relation base/16388/16403 am i doing anything wrong? regards, fous > > Right, so it would be in the .3 file at block number 109542. > > regression=# select 502758 / 131072; >  ?column? > -- >        3 > (1 row) > >

[BUGS] Re: ERROR: invalid page header in block 502758 of relation base/16388/16403

2009-09-14 Thread fous velkej
i forgot the system informations postgresql-server-8.4.0-1PGDG.rhel5 linux kernel 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5xen x86_64 centos release 5.3 (final) -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

[BUGS] ERROR: invalid page header in block 502758 of relation base/16388/16403

2009-09-14 Thread fous velkej
with similar name in the base/16388 directory. 16403 (1Gb) 16403.1 (1Gb) 16403.2 (1Gb) 16403.3 (almost 1 Gb) so the question is, where can i find the right 502758 position (i assume that this is the number of 8k block position). each file with size 1Gb has 131072 of 8k blocks. thanx for help

Re: [BUGS] BUG #4948: getting error while vacuuming the database

2009-07-28 Thread fous velkej
well, i knew how to fix it (probably the reindexing, that you mentioned;)) but i think this happens often in our database, so what informations would you like to know? i'm awaiting orders :) fous > Nope. > > If you just want to fix it, reindexing that index should do the trick. &

[BUGS] BUG #4948: getting error while vacuuming the database

2009-07-28 Thread fous
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4948 Logged by: fous Email address: honza...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4.0 Operating system: Linux (CentOS release 5.3) Description:getting error while vacuuming the database Details: hi i'm ge

[BUGS] BUG #4943: getting error while vacuuming the database

2009-07-27 Thread fous
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4943 Logged by: fous Email address: honza...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4.0 Operating system: Linux (CentOS release 5.3) Description:getting error while vacuuming the database Details: hi i'm ge