[BUGS] pg_clog problem (maybe)...

2003-09-03 Thread andrea gelmini
lem of mine)? I remember Tom solved something like this years ago. b) if so, can you show me next steps to narrow down the problem to give you a little help? Thanks a lot for your work, Andrea Gelmini ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

[BUGS] error in docs

2003-08-16 Thread andrea gelmini
d, with these packages installed: ii postgresql 7.3.3-1 Object-relational SQL database, descended from POSTGRES ii postgresql-client 7.3.3-1 Front-end programs for PostgreSQL ii postgresql-dev 7.3.3-1 Header files for libpq (postgresql library) ii postgresql-doc 7.3.3-1 Documentation for the PostgreSQL database Thanks a lot for your work, Andrea Gelmini ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[BUGS] problem with date cast

2002-05-27 Thread andrea gelmini
14:24:51 CET 2002 i686 unknown debian (sid) PostgreSQL 7.3devel on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.1 (Debian) all regression tests passed. thanks a lot for your work, andrea gelmini -- Jesus died for your sins. Make it worth his time. ---(end of broadcast)

Re: [BUGS] ehm...

2002-01-18 Thread andrea gelmini
On dom, gen 13, 2002 at 11:30:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Hm, you never did a VACUUM at all? Don't see how that can be --- > removal of CLOG segments is triggered by VACUUM. uhm... i was sure i didn't do vacuum... but... well... so I made other tests. > > Please let me know if you can still see

Re: [BUGS] ehm...

2002-01-14 Thread andrea gelmini
On ven, gen 11, 2002 at 03:16:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yes, I would like a copy of your script. i will package script and 'instructions' soon. i've got also two snapshots of db after the crash (tar files of postgres directory) > > I just found and fixed a problem that could lead to this kind

Re: [BUGS] ehm...

2002-01-14 Thread andrea gelmini
On ven, gen 11, 2002 at 01:56:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Yup, it looks like a bug to me. Apparently a CLOG segment has been > recycled too soon. We just found a bug of that ilk in sequence > processing, but VACUUM doesn't touch sequences, so apparently you have > a different bug. Please submit

[BUGS] ehm...

2002-01-11 Thread andrea gelmini
well, i will be a little verbose, but i am afraid this could be a big bug in postgresql, so... i've made a script in python that, by psycopg module, put freecddb archive in a relational db. so, it does a few select and a lot of insert for each file of freecddb (something like 500.000 files). now,

Re: [BUGS] PostgreSQL 7.0.2 Date Miscalculation

2001-04-03 Thread andrea gelmini
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:59:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > However, the horology diffs are not, and I can't reproduce them here. > Did anyone else see that? me too (the problem started in these days) ciao, andrea ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: H