Re: [BUGS] BUG #5753: Existing Functions No Longer Work

2010-11-16 Thread vince maxey
sight into what could be tweaked with your documentation so that it can be more intuitive and functions used more often   - Original Message From: Pavel Stehule To: vince maxey Cc: Tom Lane ; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Sent: Tue, November 16, 2010 1:14:14 PM Subject: Re: [

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5753: Existing Functions No Longer Work

2010-11-16 Thread vince maxey
which others can use to create their own functions. thank you for your assistance. - Original Message From: vince maxey vama...@yahoo.com To: Tom Lane Cc: Me Yahoo ; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Sent: Sat, November 13, 2010 3:44:03 PM Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5753: Existing Functions No Lon

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5753: Existing Functions No Longer Work

2010-11-13 Thread vince maxey
(conn, proc);   }   return locations;    } If I am not including something specific required to actually display a result set, can you enlighten me?  How would you write a function to return a row from the test data I provided?  I'm stumped. Sincerely, Vince Maxey - Original Mess

[BUGS] BUG #5753: Existing Functions No Longer Work

2010-11-13 Thread Vince Maxey
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5753 Logged by: Vince Maxey Email address: vama...@yahoo.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0 Operating system: Windows Description:Existing Functions No Longer Work Details: Hi, Recently I upgraded a personal

[BUGS] BUG #5711: input out of error with haversine formual

2010-10-14 Thread Vince
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5711 Logged by: Vince Email address: vincecar...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 8.4 Operating system: Linux Description:input out of error with haversine formual Details: The following will return an input out

Re: [BUGS] CVS rejected me

2001-10-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ges broke a number of things on the developers site. > > They're fixed now. If you see devel-corner in a link, it's probably > > broken - let me know where you saw it. > > I am showing this as not found: > > http://www.ca.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/postgres/cv

Re: [BUGS] CVS rejected me

2001-10-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
dn't fix it. Last nite's changes broke a number of things on the developers site. They're fixed now. If you see devel-corner in a link, it's probably broken - let me know where you saw it. Vince. --

Re: [BUGS] CVS rejected me

2001-10-01 Thread Vince Vielhaber
nsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > -- ===

Re: [BUGS] Website, mailing list

2001-09-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It would seem that that page is out of date. Vince, can you fix it? > > > Actually the instructions are correct. > > Are they? The last time I subscribed to a new list, th

Re: [BUGS] Website, mailing list

2001-09-27 Thread Vince Vielhaber
gt; http://developer.postgresql.org/subunsub.php > > It would seem that that page is out of date. Vince, can you fix it? > I have no idea where the website source files live... Actually the instructions are correct. Something happened in the last couple of weeks that broke things. I

Re: [BUGS] Alter table add column ignores default

2001-05-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 8 May 2001, Nabil Sayegh wrote: > On 05 May 2001 12:23:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Vince Vielhaber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > > > Short Description > > Alter

Re: [BUGS] Alter table add column ignores default

2001-05-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 8 May 2001, Nabil Sayegh wrote: > On 08 May 2001 10:31:17 -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > http://hermes.swu.bg/postgres/postgres/sql-altertable.htm > > > The correct syntax is: > > > ALTER TABLE foobar add column address varchar(50); > > > ALTE

Re: [DOCS] Re: [BUGS] 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

2001-01-24 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > [Sorry, didn't see the rest of this thread right away] > > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I turned the index page into a redirect so that should take care of the > > problem with the exception of pages in th

Re: [DOCS] Re: [BUGS] 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

2001-01-24 Thread Vince Vielhaber
this. The /docs directory is where the docs used to be. I was about to remove it when I noticed you guys were still maintaining FAQs and stuff in it. The only two real doc directories are in the user's lounge and developer's corner. A number of people bookmarked the old location becaus

Re: [DOCS] Re: [BUGS] 7.1 released on 2000-09-01?

2001-01-24 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Oh, thanks. Seems we are better leaving the FAQ's in there because they > are changed so often as copies from CVS. I turned the index page into a redirect so that should take care of the problem with the exception of pages in the stale docs that are bookmarked. Vince. -- =

[BUGS] Re: email addresses at http://www.postgresql.org/bugs/index.php

2000-10-06 Thread Vince Vielhaber
fixed. Vince. On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > The e-mail addresses are listed on the URL in subject in the <...> > notation. > > This makes the browser skip them as unknown tags and requires one to > look through the HTML source for addre