Tom Lane wrote:
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Would such a patch be accepted?
Seems like a brute-force solution. I'd look first at whether
AtCommit_Portals could just restart its hashtable scan after
each deletion; if that seems too inefficient, modify the hash
ta
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
"Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The hash_seq_search keeps track of what element that it should return next
in a HASH_SEQ_STATUS struct when it peruses a bucket. Removing that element
from the table won't chan
Commit_Portals doesn't avoid this problem and the end
result for me is the same regardless of where the error is. I can't drop
portals using a ExprContextCallback and I'd like to know the best way to
fix it. I can contribute a patch but I want you to decide what needs to
be fi
