Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:23:56 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Welty wrote: > > but you can consult with the attorneys for the Regents. they have > > changed the license at times, and have passed those changes on > > to other BSD license

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:58:19 -0500 (EST) Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, where did you get this wording? Is this something Berkeley released > as one of their versions of the BSD license. yes, i believe that it originally came from the Berkeley lawyers. richard -- R

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
ent Group is, though. it might end up meaning each individual, if it's not an actual corporation. there's no substitute for an informed legal opinion on this subject. is one available? richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Net

Re: [BUGS] [GENERAL] [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license

2003-11-29 Thread Richard Welty
to the trouble to talk to the IP lawyers for the Regents, you may find that you can easily get permission to migrate the license to the current "BSD License". richard -- Richard Welty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Averill Park Networ