Re: [BUGS] BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-06-19 Thread Pilling, Michael
>> The real problem here then is that the documentation showing >> the boolean comparison operators does not mention this > This page does, at length: But not in the table, in fact it doesn't even mention the IS NULL, IS NOT NULL operators at all. >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/intera

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-06-19 Thread Pilling, Michael
t haven't recently. It's not something you can rely on. Best regards, Michael -Original Message----- From: Kevin Grittner [mailto:kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov] Sent: Fri 6/17/2011 11:50 PM To: Pilling, Michael; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6064: != NULL, <&g

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6064: != NULL, <> NULL do not work [sec=UNCLASSIFIED]

2011-06-19 Thread Pilling, Michael
xist. And indeed the parser does not generate warnings either. Regards, Michael -Original Message- From: Craig Ringer [mailto:cr...@postnewspapers.com.au] Sent: Sun 6/19/2011 6:30 PM To: Kevin Grittner Cc: Pilling, Michael; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6064: != NUL