>X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
>From: "Alex Cholokov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Bug in getTimestamp() of PostgreSQL JDBC driver?
>Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 15:48:20 +0700
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>Importance: Normal
>
>Hello Peter,
>
>I have problem with JDB
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> We are running a PostgreSQL server on a Debian 2.2 and we have problems
> with
> the
> mothod getTimestamp() of the ResultSet class;
> we have find that if we insert a timestamp on a table, for example
> '2000-10-09 12:21:34.321+01'
> when we try to read that tuple
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> We just find out a small bug with the getBigDecimal(int i) method in
> ResultSet (postgresql 7.1 beta6)
>
> Th symptom is :
>
> We cannot read a decimal value with getBigDecimal() although, we can set
> it
>
> We solve the problem temporary by replacing th
Quoting "Schmidt, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The jdbc1 driver would not compile until I modified Statement.java:
>
> [javac]
> /usr/src/postgresql-7.1beta4/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/Statem
> ent.java:284: Missing term.
>
> was:
> if (result != null) &&
> ((org.postgresql
Quoting Tilo Levante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the datamodeller of JBuilder 4, only the systemtables are shown.
> The Problem is in the funtion
>
> getTableTypes() in the file
> src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/DatabaseMetaData.java
>
> This function should return a list of TableTypes
Quoting Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is no longer a problem in 7.1. The bug here was the same one
> introduced by the wrong version of Gunner's bytearray pooling patch
> being applied. It was fixed in current sources by Peter commenting out
> the bytearray pooling.
That's what I thou
Hmmm, what's the performance issues with this? Is there going to be a problem
with very large LargeObject's?
Quoting "Paul M. Aoki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyone able to fix this?
>
> here's a hack we've been using in-house (written by Jun Gabayan,
Quoting Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Seems the BIT type works in Java 7.1 beta now.
Has anything changed with boolean types in the backend then, as nothing has
been done on the JDBC side?
>
> [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
> > "Jos? Antonio Matute Calvo" wrote:
>
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Paul M. Aoki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3
> The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> Short Description
> no way in LargeObject API to detect short read?
Will check to see how libpq (which this API is based on) handles this. I've got
Quoting Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Anyone fixing this bug?
>
> > I reported a JDBC bug in the 7.1 beta1 release back in December and
> notice that the same bug is still present in the current beta 3 sources.
> The problem relates to nested cursors failing and is quite simple to
> r
Quoting Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is this a bug? Can someone submit a patch?
Why not setBoolean(parameterIndex,((Boolean)x),booleanValue());
Also, unless it's changed postgres accepts 't' & 'f' not 'true' or 'false'?
Also, which PreparedStatement.java are we taking about, as the
Quoting Stanislas Pinte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I confirm the bug, we experience the same. I haven't heard anything from
>
> peter too.
I've been suffering from email problems, one very sick Linux box (2 more dead
SCSI drives), and problems with both London Underground and Trains causing me
Quoting najeeb ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> this is to inquire whether postgresql provides the
> source code of jdbc drivers(any type).if so please let
> me know the url as soon as possible.
>
> as i need to customize it to suite my organizations
> requirements
The sources are in
13 matches
Mail list logo
