Re: [BUGS] BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

2005-04-22 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Thursday 21 April 2005 15:57, Tom Lane wrote: > I don't think it's a new bug, seeing that I didn't change the code > for the ISO case. > > I see the imprecise result only in the non-integer-datetime case; is > it acting differently for you? You're right - it has nothing to do with your patch. I

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

2005-04-21 Thread Oliver Siegmar
> I've applied this patch. It removed the bug, but also added a new one (hopefully only one ;-)) ...now with ISO DateStyle - select '2005 years 4 mons 20 days 15 hours 57 mins 12.1 secs ago'::interval; Before your patch: interval ---

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

2005-04-20 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Hi Tom, On Wednesday 20 April 2005 17:57, Tom Lane wrote: > "Oliver Siegmar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > select '10.10 secs ago'::interval; > > > > interval > > --- > > @ 10.-10 secs ago > > (1 row) > &

[BUGS] BUG #1609: Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps

2005-04-20 Thread Oliver Siegmar
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1609 Logged by: Oliver Siegmar Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0.2 Operating system: Linux Description:Bug in interval datatype for 64 Bit timestamps Details: Postgres compiled with

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1546: Temp table isn't deleted at the end of a transaction / ON COMMIT DROP has no effect

2005-03-20 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Friday 18 March 2005 14:29, Stephan Szabo wrote: > Given the error message, this seems to be the whole plpgsql caches query > plans but we don't invalidate those plans when there are schema changes. I already tried to execute the 'CREATE TEMP TABLE' statement using EXECUTE to avoid cache probl

{Spam?} Re: [BUGS] Possible temp table bug in PostgreSQL 7.4.7 / 8.0.1

2005-03-20 Thread Oliver Siegmar
On Friday 18 March 2005 18:08, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Uh, have you read the FAQ item about plpgsql and temporary tables? Doesn't seems like, eh? ;-) ...sorry for the not rtfm. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to c

[BUGS] Possible temp table bug in PostgreSQL 7.4.7 / 8.0.1

2005-03-17 Thread Oliver Siegmar
Hello, I've probably found a temp table bug in PostgreSQL (tested with 7.4.7 and 8.0.1 on Linux x86). Here's a demonstration of the bug: CREATE FUNCTION testfunction() RETURNS void AS ' BEGIN CREATE TEMP TABLE testtable (field int4) ON COMMIT DROP; INSERT INTO test

[BUGS] BUG #1546: Temp table isn't deleted at the end of a transaction / ON COMMIT DROP has no effect

2005-03-17 Thread Oliver Siegmar
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 1546 Logged by: Oliver Siegmar Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 7.4.7 / 8.0.1 Operating system: Linux x86 Description:Temp table isn't deleted at the end of a transaction / ON COMMIT

[BUGS] psql client 7.4RC1 completion bug

2003-11-08 Thread Oliver Siegmar
POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE Your name : Oliver Siegmar Your email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED