Tom Lane said:
> "Michael Brown" writes:
>> I have put in place a temporary workaround on the production system,
>> which is to insert a
>
>> // Pretend that the cache is always invalid
>> fprintf ( stderr, "*** bypassing cache ***\n" )
Tom Lane said:
> I shall go and do some further investigation, but at least it's now
> clear where to look. Thanks for the report, and for being so helpful in
> providing information!
Thank you!
I have put in place a temporary workaround on the production system, which
is to insert a
//
On Thursday 24 September 2009 23:02:15 Michael Brown wrote:
> > I think this must mean that corrupt data is being read from the relcache
> > init file. The reason a restart fixes it is probably that restart
> > forcibly removes the old init file, which is good for recovery but n
