Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris

2003-10-27 Thread Josh Wilmes
Seems like the BEST case would be to have a configure test verify that it works and define something if it does, but i don't know what such a test would look like. --Josh Bruce Momjian wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ! #if defined(sun) && defined(__sparc__)

Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris

2003-10-24 Thread Josh Wilmes
Bruce Momjian wrote: Josh Wilmes wrote: Nope, __solaris__ is not defined on our system either. I thought our configure defined __portname__ for every platform, but I don't see that anywhere, so it seems we rely on the compiler to supply defines for the cpu and OS. Does src/tools/ccsym sho

Re: [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris

2003-10-24 Thread Josh Wilmes
? --- Josh Wilmes wrote: I hope this is the right place to send this.. the FAQ in the distribution mentions http://www.PostgreSQL.org/bugs/bugs.php, which doesn't work. We've found that postgresql wasn't using ISM shared memory on

[BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris

2003-10-24 Thread Josh Wilmes
I hope this is the right place to send this.. the FAQ in the distribution mentions http://www.PostgreSQL.org/bugs/bugs.php, which doesn't work. We've found that postgresql wasn't using ISM shared memory on solaris, which theoretically would cost performance. The root cause in our case was th