On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 12:35:17PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jerome Alet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > if I drop a database and recreate a new one with the
> > same name, the old datas and base schema are still there
> > to annoy me.
>
> Looks to me like yo
POSTGRESQL BUG REPORT TEMPLATE
Your name : Jerome Alet
Your email address : [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Jerome Alet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 2
> > The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
> > I've defined unix_socket_directory to be /var/lib/postgres
> > in /var/lib/data/postgres
sorry. Maybe next year or around December, but
now it's impossible.
sorry, but not my fault.
bye,
Jerome Alet
restricitions.
bye,
Jerome ALET - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://cortex.unice.fr/~jerome
Faculte de Medecine de Nice - http://noe.unice.fr - Tel: 04 93 37 76 30
28 Avenue de Valombrose - 06107 NICE Cedex 2 - FRANCE
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Martin Kuria ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) report
q | sequence | jerome
(1 row)
The ALTER command should have created a sequence named bar_id_seq, as well
as an index but has done none.
I suppose it's a bug.
also it would be fine if ALTER could rename other things than just tables;
bye,
Jerome ALET - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://cortex.unice.f
t; user's acl in the database, and the deleted user id being reused, I've not
> > done anything, but I consider this a major problem. Please consider it for
> > a next version.
bye,
Jerome ALET - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://cortex.unice.fr/~jerome
Faculte de Medecine de Ni
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> ... CENSORED :-) ... I will add it to the TODO.
Aleluya (sp. ?) !!!
At least you plan to do something, then I'm finally happy.
When you'll correct this, and I hope it will be soon, please don't forget
to correct the other b
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 12:28:38PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> That is the issue? That UPDATE grants DELETE? I can UPDATE all fields
> to NULL, and that is pretty much the same as DELETE. We can easily add
> documentation on that "feature".
Sure, do it, however you're still wrong.
For the s
