ound tcount parameter is said to
be applied to even INSERT. I believe people think that parameter is
to limit memory consumption when returning tuples thus it'd be applied
for only SELECT or DML with RETURNING. So I'm +1 for non-fix but
redefine the behavior. Who wants to limit the numbe
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6172
Logged by: Hitoshi Harada
Email address: umi.tan...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1RC1
Operating system: Windows7
Description:DROP EXTENSION error without CASCADE
Details:
On pure-installed RC1
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6139
Logged by: Hitoshi Harada
Email address: umi.tan...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 8.2+
Operating system: Any
Description:LIMIT doesn't return correct result when the value is
huge
Details:
db1=# s
gt; are only aggregates that have "internal" for aggtranstype.
So, is it better to generalize as it adds ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_INITSIZE if
the transtype is internal, rather than specifying individual function
OID as the patch stands?
Regards,
--
Hitoshi Harada
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailin
the correct answers, since the default window frame runs
> from first row to current row. If you don't like them, you may need
> to specify a different window frame.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
And it's well-documented. See
http://www.postgresql.org/docs
bbb | f| bbb
ccc | t|
(3 rows)
So the 1. ROW(...) construction seems not valid.
>
> --
> Heikki Linnakangas
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
&