Re: [BUGS] BUG #1331: after update: vacuum blocks parallel to select

2004-11-29 Thread Enke, Michael
But the description says: vacuum can run parallel to selects. This is than not true. Regards, Michael Tom Lane schrieb: "PostgreSQL Bugs List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Description:after update: vacuum blocks parallel to select This isn't a bug, it's simply vacuum waiting until it can ac

Re: [BUGS] BUG #1110: psql -h localhost consults the nameservice

2004-04-05 Thread Enke, Michael
Tom Lane wrote: "PostgreSQL Bugs List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: If I call "psql -h localhost" it is very slow compared to "psql -h 127.0.0.1" since for "localhost" the nameservice is consulted. This is not a bug; it's supposed to do that. If you don't like it, reconfigure your name service (

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from

2003-07-11 Thread Enke, Michael
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > I have looked into my Linux box and found this in /usr/share/i18n/charmaps/BIG5.gz: > > % Chinese charmap for BIG5 (CP950) > > % version: 0.92 > > % Contact: Tung-Han Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > % Yuan-Chung Cheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > % Distribution and us

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW

2003-06-28 Thread Enke, Michael
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > > > I reported bug #943 (I found in 7.3.2) and you checked in some change against > > > > integer overflow. > > > > Now I upgraded to 7.3.3 and I'm not happy with this. > > > > The exact error as I described is fixed, but I found new errors in conversion > > > > UTF-8 <

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW toUTF-8

2003-06-26 Thread Enke, Michael
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > Hello, > > I reported bug #943 (I found in 7.3.2) and you checked in some change against > > integer overflow. > > Now I upgraded to 7.3.3 and I'm not happy with this. > > The exact error as I described is fixed, but I found new errors in conversion > > UTF-8 <-> EUC_TW

[BUGS] again: Bug #943: Server-Encoding from EUC_TW to UTF-8 doesn'twork

2003-06-19 Thread Enke, Michael
Hello, I reported bug #943 (I found in 7.3.2) and you checked in some change against integer overflow. Now I upgraded to 7.3.3 and I'm not happy with this. The exact error as I described is fixed, but I found new errors in conversion UTF-8 <-> EUC_TW and BIG5: Copy to table (DB has UTF-8 encodin

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on

2002-06-12 Thread Enke, Michael
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > > > > There are "full width alphabets" in Japanese. Thoes include not only > > > > > ASCII letters but also some European characters. > > > > > > > > Are these ASCII and European characters uppercased in some > > > > Japanese-specific way ? > > > > > > Probably not, but

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on

2002-05-17 Thread Enke, Michael
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > > Are you sure that say, de_DE.utf8 locale produce meaningful results > > > for any other languages? > > > > there are often subtle differences, but upper() and lower() are much > > more likely to produce right results than collation order or date/money > > formats. > >

Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on ->multibyte<- DB

2002-05-13 Thread Enke, Michael
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > [Cc:ed to hackers] > > (trying select convert(lower(convert('X', 'LATIN1')),'LATIN1','UNICODE');) > > > Ok, this is working now (I cann't reproduce why not at the first time). > > Good. > > > Is it planned to implement it so that I can write lower()/ upper() for multib

Re: [BUGS] Bug #659: lower()/upper() bug on ->multibyte<- DB

2002-05-10 Thread Enke, Michael
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > I don't think using de_DE.utf8 helps. The locale support just calls > tolower(), which is not be able to handle multibyte chars. > > > > Oops. That should be: > > > > > > select convert(lower(convert('X', 'LATIN1')),'LATIN1','UNICODE'); > > > It looks ugly, but works. > > >