On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
PE> Denis N. Stepanov wrote:
PE> > snprintf()/vsnprintf() functions are not ANSI-compliant
PE>
PE> Yes, they are.
Sorry, I was talking about ANSI X3.159-1989, which certainly does not declare
snprintf(). In practice it is diffucult t
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
TL> "PostgreSQL Bugs List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TL> > Some OSes lack proper snprintf()/vsnprintf() fuctions so PostgreSQL includes
TL> > its own version (src/port/snprintf.c) during building. Unfortunately, this
TL> > version of snprintf() is not reentran
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
TL> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TL> > The following line:
TL> > SELECT 1875/1000.0
TL> > produces different results. In 7.2.3 it is:
TL> > ?column?
TL> > -
TL> >1.875
TL>
TL> > while in 7.3.1 it is:
TL> > ?column?
TL> > ---
; > Removing /usr/local/pgsql/data.
> > Removing temp file /tmp/initdb.32548.
>
> I faced with exactly the same trouble since PostgreSQL 6.4.
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Denis N. Stepanov.
> BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
t; Removing /usr/local/pgsql/data.
> Removing temp file /tmp/initdb.32548.
I faced with exactly the same trouble since PostgreSQL 6.4.
Sincerely yours,
Denis N. Stepanov.
BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
