gt;you want.
here you are right also, because it seems now, that if "order by id" is missing
then data results of a query could vary depending on changes to a
record done(or other
algorythms).
Lets close this bug.
With deep respect,
Denis Kolesnik.
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
conclude
not without a reason that the queries different on presense or absense
"...limit 2 offset 2..." should return results which are consistent.
Basing on this I conclude, that it is a bug.
With respect,
Denis Kolesnik.
On 8/22/12, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Denis Kolesnik wrot
I have now VERY strong argument to consider it is as a bug:
if there a understandable for SQL language sequence which sorts
in other fashion when adding "LIMIT".
I did try the same with a last name starting with "G" (there also more
than one entry with identical surnames) and it worked ok(the res
