On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Klaus Ita wrote:
> Isn't it a funny coincidence, that we also had a corruption of that
> same/similar type?
>
> my disk was quite confidently not tampered. I am wondering: Does PG sign, or
> checksum wal_files? Is the integrity of wal_files ensured by any mechanism
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> dan...@heroku.com writes:
>> We have a somewhat high-churn table acting as a queue, and over time it's
>> grown to be something like a gigabyte. I surmised it might be vanilla
>> bloat, but the truth seems somewhat more exotic because both VACUUM
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2013-04-12 08:34:24 +, dan...@heroku.com wrote:
>>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>>
>>> Bug reference: 8058
&
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-04-12 08:34:24 +, dan...@heroku.com wrote:
>> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>>
>> Bug reference: 8058
>> Logged by: Daniel Farina
>> Email address: dan...
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, ajmcello wrote:
> unsubscribe
That's not how you unsubscribe from this list; you'll want to do that here:
http://www.postgresql.org/community/lists/subscribe/
--
fdr
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subs
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:42 AM, DUBILLOT Aurelien
wrote:
> I read on your website that PostgreSQL source code is free for use and
> modification, but in my case I am working on a project where we are
> generating our own setup and we would like to integrate PostgreSQL setup
> within it.
This isn
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
>
>> Can you try master on xlogdump instead of the release? I have fixed a few
>> bugs there a year ago that don't seem to be in the release, and will f
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <
> hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, that sure looks like the same issue Kyotaro HORIGUCHI reported (
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20121206.130458.170549097.horiguchi
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas writes:
>> On 22.01.2013 15:31, jan-peter.seif...@gmx.de wrote:
>> Try:
>> CREATE EXTENSION "uuid-ossp"
>
> Although this isn't a bug, it does seem like a usability fail.
> Did we make a conscious decision not to call the exte
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2012-11-09 15:57:06 -0800, Daniel Farina wrote:
>> This is the only known occurrence to me, ever, but given it's
>> incredibly ephemeral nature probably glossed over most of the time, I
>> can't say "i
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 22:49 +, dan...@heroku.com wrote:
>> PGError: ERROR: could not read block 556642 in file "base/16385/2904143.4":
>> read only 0 of 8192
>
> Does that seem wildly off to you, or a little off? Do you think that
> block may
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> dan...@heroku.com writes:
>> select '1 5 hours'::interval = '1 day 5 hours'::interval;
>> ?column?
>> --
>> t
>> (1 row)
>
>> I think that the first spelling, a unit-less '1', should not be accepted.
>
> Not sure I agree. The syntax '1
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 10:33 AM, wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 7486
> Logged by: Anderson Abreu
> Email address: andersonab...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.12
> Operating system: Linux
> Description:
>
> Dear,
>
> I'm te
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:03:18PM -0700, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
>> So, is there hope of a better fix here for 9.2 (specifically for
>> preserving extension ownership on pg_upgrade and dump/restore, though
>> I understand it may not make sens
On Jun 28, 2012 7:44 AM, "Kapil Kr. Khandelwal" wrote:
>
> Dear Team
>
>
> When I restarted the postgres9.0 service by windows then getting
following error message. Plz help me.
>
> Error Message(Error 1053) : The service did not respond start or control
requested in timely fashion.
>
> Please s
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Daniel Farina" writes:
>> We have on hand a database that makes heavy use of the txid_snapshot family
>> of functions, and recently it just passed its 4^32 transaction mark.
>> Unfortunately, upon wraparound th
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6291
Logged by: Daniel Farina
Email address: dan...@heroku.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.5
Operating system: Ubuntu 10.04
Description:Xid epoch is not updated properly
Details:
We have on hand a database that
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6200
Logged by: Daniel Farina
Email address: dan...@heroku.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4
Operating system: Ubuntu 10.04
Description:standby bad memory allocations on SELECT
Details:
A huge thanks to Conrad
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> On 25.08.2011 19:11, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So the problem is that walreceiver merrily writes so much future WAL that
>>> it
>>> runs out of disk space? A limit o
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6170
Logged by: Daniel Farina
Email address: dan...@heroku.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4
Operating system: GNU/Linux Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64
Description:hot standby wedging on full-WAL disk
Details:
After seeing
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Daniel Farina writes:
>> From what I can tell, people only see this problem with pg_dump, which
>> is interesting. This symptom has a very long history:
>
> Yeah. There seems to be some well-hidden bug whereby dropping
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> It may also be useful information to know that no recent shenanigans
> have happened on this server: it's been up continuously for about 500
> days. That doesn't mean something interesting did not occur a very
>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> A medium-length story short, this query returns non-zero:
>
> select count(distinct typnamespace) from pg_type where not exists
> (select 1 from pg_namespace where oid = pg_type.typnamespace);
>
> I did a very brief
A medium-length story short, this query returns non-zero:
select count(distinct typnamespace) from pg_type where not exists
(select 1 from pg_namespace where oid = pg_type.typnamespace);
I did a very brief search in all the release notes for 8.3.5 to
8.3.14, but have not found precisely what I w
24 matches
Mail list logo
