Re: [BUGS] Unexpected omission of tables with duplicate names across schemas

2010-09-29 Thread Chris Ross
On 09/28/2010 01:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Chris Ross writes: When there is a table (or view, or sequence) of the same name in one schema as another, and both of these schemas are in the set search_path, only the first schema in the search path will show that name in the output of \d[S

Re: [BUGS] Unexpected omission of tables with duplicate names across schemas

2010-09-29 Thread Chris Ross
On 09/29/2010 02:08 PM, Chris Ross wrote: On 09/28/2010 01:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote: That's the intended behavior, because only the first one is actually accessible without schema-qualifying its name. You can use a pattern of "*.*" if you want to see objects that are hidden accordin

[BUGS] Unexpected omission of tables with duplicate names across schemas

2010-09-28 Thread Chris Ross
When there is a table (or view, or sequence) of the same name in one schema as another, and both of these schemas are in the set search_path, only the first schema in the search path will show that name in the output of \d[S+]. (Also \dt, \dv, etc) PostgreSQL versions: 8.2.x, 8.3.x, 8.4.4,