Re: [BUGS] BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names

2006-01-25 Thread Brandon Black
On 1/24/06, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > I haven't looked at SQL99 or SQL2003, but most likely they say the same > > thing in two or three times as many words ;-) > > Thanks for the pointer. In SQL 2003, this is 7.12 > : > > 17) Case: > a) If the i-th in the

[BUGS] BUG #2204: Feature Req: Unique output column names

2006-01-24 Thread Brandon Black
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2204 Logged by: Brandon Black Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: All Operating system: All Description:Feature Req: Unique output column names Details: -Example

Re: [BUGS] concurrent drop table with fkeys corrupt pg_trigger

2005-11-01 Thread Brandon Black
>Subject: Re: concurrent drop table with fkeys corrupt pg_trigger >Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 09:47:25 +0800" >Qingqing Zhou" writes >> If we concurrently perform drop/create table (with foreign keys) commands >> several times, we could corrupt the pg_trigger system table. >> > >Anybody reproduced it?