Re: [BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2

2004-12-20 Thread Belbin, Peter
urday, December 18, 2004 12:00 AM To: Belbin, Peter Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2 I wrote: > This is standard practice for gcc: it tries to use "cleaned up" > versions of system headers that will not elicit useless warnings from > gcc. 

Re: [BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2

2004-12-20 Thread Belbin, Peter
27;t tried executing it yet, but at least it's built without complaints. Thank you for your help. regards, Peter.   -Original Message- From: Mike Mascari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2004 5:03 AM To: Tom Lane Cc: Belbin, Peter; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sub

Re: [BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2

2004-12-17 Thread Belbin, Peter
there's either something bogus about the gcc for solaris 10, or perhaps there's a way to get gcc to ignore the gcc version, and use the 'normal' version..?   -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 12:04 AM

[BUGS] solaris 10 with gcc 3.3.2

2004-12-06 Thread Belbin, Peter
Should I be able to compile with gcc 3.3.2 (from sunfreeware) on solaris 10?   I'm using sparc, and am getting some strange looking compiler errors when trying to do the make.   I'm getting some compiler parse errors when compiling exec.c.       make -C doc allmake[1]: Entering directory `