Re: [BUGS] BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order

2008-05-08 Thread Aleksej Saushev
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> This brings up a good question. Exactly how do users know what format >> _binary_ is? int4 is network byte order, but what about int8, float4, >> inet? > > This is exactly what libpqtypes solves. Not only do we handle > form

Re: [BUGS] Re: BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order

2008-05-08 Thread Aleksej Saushev
Andrew Chernow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Aleksej Saushev wrote: >>> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>>> This brings up a good question. Exactly

[BUGS] BUG #4053: libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers are passed in network octet order

2008-03-24 Thread Aleksej Saushev
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 4053 Logged by: Aleksej Saushev Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.3 Operating system: NetBSD, but this does no matter Description:libpq documentation should express clearly, that integers