2013/1/13 Andres Freund :
> On 2013-01-12 15:13:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund writes:
>> > On 2013-01-12 14:29:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> I think that the alternative most likely to succeed is to consider any
>> >> change in the active value of search_path as forcing replanning o
On 2013-01-12 15:13:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2013-01-12 14:29:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think that the alternative most likely to succeed is to consider any
> >> change in the active value of search_path as forcing replanning of
> >> cached plans.
>
> > I gu
Em 12-01-2013 18:13, Tom Lane escreveu:
Andres Freund writes:
On 2013-01-12 14:29:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I think that the alternative most likely to succeed is to consider any
change in the active value of search_path as forcing replanning of
cached plans.
I guess it wouldn't really be fea
