On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Anna Zaks wrote:
> I opened an analyzer Bugzilla report for this issue in case you 'd
> like to follow up there:
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13010
Thanks, I'll try to schedule another run tonight and post additional
details on that ticket.
On Fri, Jun
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Anna Zaks wrote:
> Josh,
>
> What kid of machine are you using? Please, let me know how long it
> took after it's done (It takes about one and a half hours on mine).
It just finished, actually: took about 7 hours to run, not counting
the time the machine was aslee
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> zaks.a...@gmail.com writes:
>> There are two memory leaks in dumputils (v9.2.0beta1):
>
>> 1)
>> File: src/bin/scripts/dumputils.c
>> Location: line 604, column 11
>> Description: Memory is never released; potential leak of memory
>>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:37:06PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I share Tom's caution on this, but I think we need to make sure we are
> > addressing any possible risk of an isolated pg_upgrade fix, now that we
> > understand the cause.
>
> FYI, this query will show any functions defined in the
On 1 June 2012 06:06, Tom Lane wrote:
> There were no html reports attached, and I'd prefer plain text
> anyway please ...
I saw a number of false positives when I ran the Clang static analyser
a few months ago. As I recall, I could see why the tool concluded that
certain lines of code may have c
