Re: [BUGS] BUG #6347: Reopening bug #6085

2012-02-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 04:17:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie feb 03 15:52:29 -0300 2012: > > > Actually, thinking more about this, the old pg_upgrade didn't use pg_ctl > > wait/-w mode, but rather kept trying to connect until the server was up.

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6347: Reopening bug #6085

2012-02-03 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie feb 03 15:52:29 -0300 2012: > Actually, thinking more about this, the old pg_upgrade didn't use pg_ctl > wait/-w mode, but rather kept trying to connect until the server was up. > Once pg_ctl -w worked in more cases in PG 9.1, the new pg_upgrade > star

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6347: Reopening bug #6085

2012-02-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:59:07AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:06:31PM +, alexander.for...@gmail.com wrote: > > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > > > Bug reference: 6347 > > Logged by: Alexander Fortin > > Email address: alexa

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6404: postgres account not created during unattended install

2012-02-03 Thread Dharmendra Goyal
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Mark Phillips wrote: > Thank you for the reply. I have spent the better part of this week on this > and related issues. > > My test procedure is as follows: create VM using Fusion 4.x with a fresh > install of OS X 10.7. The VM is hosted on a Mac also running 10.7.

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6404: postgres account not created during unattended install

2012-02-03 Thread Mark Phillips
Thank you for the reply. I have spent the better part of this week on this and related issues. My test procedure is as follows: create VM using Fusion 4.x with a fresh install of OS X 10.7. The VM is hosted on a Mac also running 10.7. I create a snapshot of this clean image. The first step of

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple

2012-02-03 Thread Tom Lane
Duncan Rance writes: > On 3 Feb 2012, at 06:45, Tom Lane wrote: >> I probably ought to let the test case run overnight before concluding >> anything, but at this point it's run for two-plus hours with no errors >> after applying this patch: > Thank Tom! I've had this running for a few hours now w

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple

2012-02-03 Thread Duncan Rance
On 3 Feb 2012, at 06:45, Tom Lane wrote: > > I probably ought to let the test case run overnight before concluding > anything, but at this point it's run for two-plus hours with no errors > after applying this patch: > > diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c > b/src/backend/access/trans

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6347: Reopening bug #6085

2012-02-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 03:06:31PM +, alexander.for...@gmail.com wrote: > The following bug has been logged on the website: > > Bug reference: 6347 > Logged by: Alexander Fortin > Email address: alexander.for...@gmail.com > PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2 > Operating system: Ubu

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6430: Wal Segment Size is 128GB

2012-02-03 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 03.02.2012 11:25, giri.anami...@gmail.com wrote: The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6430 Logged by: Girish Email address: giri.anami...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0.0 Operating system: Linux Description: For Postgres Advanced Server 9.0

[BUGS] BUG #6430: Wal Segment Size is 128GB

2012-02-03 Thread giri . anamika0
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 6430 Logged by: Girish Email address: giri.anami...@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0.0 Operating system: Linux Description: For Postgres Advanced Server 9.0 Version - default sever configuration has WAL

Re: [BUGS] BUG #6425: Bus error in slot_deform_tuple

2012-02-03 Thread Bridget Frey
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone who has been working so hard on this issue. I realize it's not certain that this would fix the issues we're seeing, but we'd be willing to try it out and report back. The only caveat is we would need to deploy it to production, so if someone could let us kn