Tom,
You are right, my apologies for rushing in with innacurate information. There
is no problem with Red Hat's RPM's, in fact we decided to repackage PostgreSQL
for our needs based on the current work by Red Hat and Fedora (spec file /
integration), though with a few minor changes.
The main p
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference: 6357
Logged by: Stephane
Email address: stef.cous...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.2
Operating system: Mac OS X 10.6.8
Description:
Hello
I didn't manage to download your product, and it is written
Hi,
Feel free to ignore this 'bug report', it's most likely INVALID, as I assumed
it was a binary release from upstream, which is incorrect. In fact I was
referring to the 'PGDG' RPM's. Mainly the situation is that the PostgreSQL
provided by Red Hat on RHEL5 doesn't suit our needs, and while PG
Daniel Migowski writes:
> I have a rare problem. I just restored a large database, and found out I made
> an error. Now I want to drop it, but can't do it because of the autovacuum
> process, running for minutes now, which i don't want to kill.
Um ... if you're going to drop the database, why w
Hello,
I have a rare problem. I just restored a large database, and found out I made
an error. Now I want to drop it, but can't do it because of the autovacuum
process, running for minutes now, which i don't want to kill.
Isn't it possible to stop it from running if this is the only process con
