On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maxim Boguk writes:
>> I know GIST on intarray[] do not have that problem.
>> Very likely the problem is limited to intarray[] GIN indexes only
>> (but I going to test some other not-well known GIN indexes tomorrow).
>
>> Broken FTS indexes on Ho
"Roye Cohen" wrote:
> I found a degradation in physical memory used on DB server (~200%
> degradation)
What are you measuring, and what were the numbers?
> and a small degradation in response times on every transaction
> monitored in comparison to 9.0.
What transaction isolation level was
Roye Cohen wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 6311
> Logged by: Roye Cohen
> Email address: roye.co...@sap.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1
> Operating system: Linux Redhat
> Description:Performance degradation after upgrade
> Detai
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6311
Logged by: Roye Cohen
Email address: roye.co...@sap.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1
Operating system: Linux Redhat
Description:Performance degradation after upgrade
Details:
Hi,
I am a performance engineer
On 11/25/2011 08:21 PM, Thomas Goerner wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6308
Logged by: Thomas Goerner
Email address: t...@clickware.de
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.1
Operating system: Windows 7 64-bit
Description:Problem w. encoding in cli
