于 2011/9/15 19:26, Robert Haas 写道:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:57 AM, farta wrote:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 6193
Logged by: farta
Email address: fayfa...@gmail.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4
Operating system: Windows 7 64 bit
Description:
Problem solved:
I reinstall postgres from sources, works.
pasman
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:57 AM, farta wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 6193
> Logged by: farta
> Email address: fayfa...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 9.0.4
> Operating system: Windows 7 64 bit
> Description: The one-click install
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, that's about what it would take, but what I'm asking is why
> bother. The *only* case that we support here is turning a just-created,
> not-fooled-with table into a view, and I don't feel a need to promise
> that we will handle other cases
On 15.09.2011 06:55, Eduardo Piombino wrote:
Problem came when I tried to update the child table a, which holds a fk to
b, after doing two updates to the same record in a. The other session will
fail to obtain the lock after the second update (but won't fail immediately
after the first one).
Tom
On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:47 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 03:15, pasman wrote:
>>
>> The following bug has been logged online:
>>
>> Bug reference: 6204
>> Logged by: pasman
>> Email address: pasma...@gmail.com
>> PostgreSQL version: 9.1.0
>> Operating syst
