vince maxey writes:
> I am running my test procs from the pgAdminIII GUI. Is my syntax wrong to
> execute the function? If I run select test_proc1(3), I do get the correct
> result which is a column header (test_proc1 integer) and a value (2). So why
> wouldn't I get a 6-column result set wh
Thanks for your response, Tom.
I guess my question would be, what needs to change in my syntax to expect to
get
one row returned?
Here are a couple of examples that do work in my existing application prior to
my recent computer switch and re-build (and I have well over 100 of these types
of f
"Vince Maxey" writes:
> Recently I upgraded a personal application built a number of years ago,
> including java, eclipse, struts and postgresql and now face an issue with
> postgresql in that application functions no longer work, specfically as
> related to refcursors. The original application w
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5753
Logged by: Vince Maxey
Email address: vama...@yahoo.com
PostgreSQL version: 9.0
Operating system: Windows
Description:Existing Functions No Longer Work
Details:
Hi,
Recently I upgraded a personal applic
I get this whenever debug_print_rewritten = on
WARNING: 01000: could not dump unrecognized node type: 928
LOCATION: _outNode, outfuncs.c:2787
right before
LOG: 0: rewritten parse tree:
PostgreSQL 8.4.5 on Linux x86-64
Does this sound familiar?
--
Jon
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing l
