Re: [BUGS] BUG #5589: psql dies with bad free() in libedit

2010-08-01 Thread Steve Atkins
On Aug 1, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Steve Atkins" writes: >> I have a database that contains two tables (partminer and partminer2), and >> two sequences (partminer2_id_seq and partminer_pk), on a 9.0beta3 >> installation built from source with default configure options. >> From psql,

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5589: psql dies with bad free() in libedit

2010-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
"Steve Atkins" writes: > I have a database that contains two tables (partminer and partminer2), and > two sequences (partminer2_id_seq and partminer_pk), on a 9.0beta3 > installation built from source with default configure options. > From psql, entering "\d p" works as expected. Entering "\d pa"

[BUGS] BUG #5589: psql dies with bad free() in libedit

2010-08-01 Thread Steve Atkins
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5589 Logged by: Steve Atkins Email address: st...@blighty.com PostgreSQL version: 9.0beta3 Operating system: OS X Description:psql dies with bad free() in libedit Details: I have a database that contains two t

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-08-01 Thread Alex Hunsaker
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 14:02, Karl Denninger wrote: > (Whether Postgress 9's internal replication will solve this for me when it > is released is something I'm not sure about - I think the answer is "no", > since if I'm reading the docs correctly Postgres 9 requires that both master > and slave b

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-08-01 Thread Karl Denninger
Tom Lane wrote: > Karl Denninger writes: > >> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> >>> how exactly did you measure the 1GB. >> The reported copy table size in the SLON log. It exceeded 1GB for two >> of the tables the successfully came over before the error. >> > > Hmm, I'm not sure how S

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-08-01 Thread Karl Denninger
Tom Lane wrote: > Karl Denninger writes: > >> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> >>> how exactly did you measure the 1GB? >>> > > >> The reported copy table size in the SLON log. It exceeded 1GB for two >> of the tables the successfully came over before the error. >> > > Hmm,

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-08-01 Thread Tom Lane
Karl Denninger writes: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: >> how exactly did you measure the 1GB? > The reported copy table size in the SLON log. It exceeded 1GB for two > of the tables the successfully came over before the error. Hmm, I'm not sure how Slony comes by that number, so this might or m

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-08-01 Thread Karl Denninger
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > On 08/01/2010 08:33 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: >> Alex Hunsaker wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 00:08, Karl Denninger >>> wrote: >>> The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5585 Logged by: Karl Denninger Email a

Re: [BUGS] BUG #5585: SSL problems with long COPYs

2010-08-01 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
On 08/01/2010 08:33 AM, Karl Denninger wrote: Alex Hunsaker wrote: On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 00:08, Karl Denninger wrote: The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 5585 Logged by: Karl Denninger Email address:k...@denninger.net PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4 Operating sy