Re: [BUGS] Postgres on AIX5.3 and AIX6.1

2010-06-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Chris Browne wrote: > alvhe...@commandprompt.com (Alvaro Herrera) writes: >> Excerpts from Chris Browne's message of jue jun 24 14:40:30 -0400 2010: >>> robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) writes: >>> > This patch makes it clear that the workaround is no good on AI

Re: [BUGS] Postgres on AIX5.3 and AIX6.1

2010-06-24 Thread Chris Browne
alvhe...@commandprompt.com (Alvaro Herrera) writes: > Excerpts from Chris Browne's message of jue jun 24 14:40:30 -0400 2010: >> robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) writes: >> > This patch makes it clear that the workaround is no good on AIX 6.1, >> > but it doesn't seem quite clear about whether t

Re: [BUGS] Postgres on AIX5.3 and AIX6.1

2010-06-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Chris Browne's message of jue jun 24 14:40:30 -0400 2010: > robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) writes: > > This patch makes it clear that the workaround is no good on AIX 6.1, > > but it doesn't seem quite clear about whether the underlying problem > > has been fixed in AIX 6.1. It

Re: [BUGS] Postgres on AIX5.3 and AIX6.1

2010-06-24 Thread Chris Browne
robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) writes: > This patch makes it clear that the workaround is no good on AIX 6.1, > but it doesn't seem quite clear about whether the underlying problem > has been fixed in AIX 6.1. It would be good to understand that. Better? -- (format nil "~...@~s" "cbbrowne"

Re: [BUGS] Postgres on AIX5.3 and AIX6.1

2010-06-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Chris Browne wrote: > pie...@hogranch.com (John R Pierce) writes: >> On 06/23/10 6:02 PM, Chris Browne wrote: >>> There is already an FAQ on issues relating to AIX. It is, in recent >>> versions, part of the documentation tree: >>> >>>

Re: [BUGS] Postgres on AIX5.3 and AIX6.1

2010-06-24 Thread Chris Browne
pie...@hogranch.com (John R Pierce) writes: > On 06/23/10 6:02 PM, Chris Browne wrote: >> There is already an FAQ on issues relating to AIX. It is, in recent >> versions, part of the documentation tree: >> >> >> > > can I