On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm
>>> not sure why that happens. Is that what you're asking about?
>
>> Anyone else have an opinion
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm
>>> not sure why that happens. Is that what you're asking about?
>
>> Anyone else have an opinion
Robert Haas writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm
>> not sure why that happens. Is that what you're asking about?
> Anyone else have an opinion on whether this is a bug?
It's arguably a bug, but sinc
2010/3/3 Oleg Serov :
> I'm asking to fix this =)
>
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It does seem weird that assigning NEW to var changes the value; I'm
>> not sure why that happens. Is that what you're asking about?
Anyone else have an opinion on whether this is a bug?
.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Thomas Kellerer
wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Is the problem specific to 8.4.2 or to the Windows platform (or both)?
Neither, actually.
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http:/
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> By splitting out the doc building into a separate target, we will have
> less users installing the documentation.
I don't see why. And even if it's true, it just means some people
were installing the docs "by accident" before even though
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
>>> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
>
>> But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
>> have the docs availabl
On fre, 2010-03-05 at 08:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
> >> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
>
> > But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
> > have the docs
Tom's suggestion is much better than mine. I concur fully.
My issue, essentially, is that I want to get on with the business of actually
testing these alphas...
The 'Jade effect' has become an obstacle; time wasted.
And, though I do want the documentation - ultimately - I'd like the optio
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 5364
Logged by: Markus Wichitill
Email address: ma...@gmx.de
PostgreSQL version: 8.4.2
Operating system: Linux, Win7
Description:citext behavior when type not in public schema
Details:
Comparisons with columns
Thanks for the feedback.
Is the problem specific to 8.4.2 or to the Windows platform (or both)?
Regards
Thomas
Bruce Momjian, 27.02.2010 18:42:
Yes, we have received a few reports about this and are working on a fix.
--
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
>> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
> But that would be a negative regression for end users, who we want to
> have the docs available by default, so they can read them.
"End users" in th
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 17:53 +, Lou Picciano wrote:
> While I'd agree a 'make all' should, uh... make _all_, and that make
> building based on lots of guessing is counterintuitive, an option to
> configure like:
>
> ./configure --no-docs or ./configure --with-htmldocs-only
>
> - with som
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that the whole idea of make targets building different things
> depending on what you've built previously is confusing,
> counterintuitive, and illogical. make all should either build the
> docs, or not; trying to guess what the user
14 matches
Mail list logo
