Tom Lane [2009-04-10 1:15 -0400]:
> Martin Pitt writesyuqhom#3:
> > The test suite detected one regression in libpq, though: Setting
> > $PGHOST now complains about a missing root.crt, although this is only
> > relevant on the server side (or did I misunderstood this?)
>
> No, that's a progressi
Martin Pitt writes:
> The test suite detected one regression in libpq, though: Setting
> $PGHOST now complains about a missing root.crt, although this is only
> relevant on the server side (or did I misunderstood this?)
No, that's a progression: the client wants to validate the server's
cert, too
Hello all,
I have been packaging cvs snapshots, and now 8.4 beta 1 for Debian
recently, and hammered on postgresql-common enough to make it work
with 8.4 now (some changed semantics, migration of obsolete/renamed
postgresql.conf settings, etc.). Almost all of the tests pass now, so
it's generally
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao writes:
>> Attached patch fixes the bug. Is this worth committing?
>
> Applied to HEAD, but it didn't seem worth back-patching. Thanks.
Thanks.
> PS: when you generate a diff against a non-clean source tree, please
> remove th
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 12:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Where are we on this?
>
> Pretty much nowhere --- there's no proposed patch, and I don't think
> it's exactly trivial. Do you want to put it on TODO?
Here is a patch that does what I think Heikki was suggesting. If a
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Where are we on this?
Pretty much nowhere --- there's no proposed patch, and I don't think
it's exactly trivial. Do you want to put it on TODO?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
Has there been any progress on this?
---
Jonathan Barnhart wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 4738
> Logged by: Jonathan Barnhart
> Email address: jdbarnh...@yahoo.co
Where are we on this?
---
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
> > "SIGINT -- The server disallows new connections and sends all existing
> > server processes SIGTERM, which will cause them to abort their current
>
Fujii Masao writes:
> Attached patch fixes the bug. Is this worth committing?
Applied to HEAD, but it didn't seem worth back-patching. Thanks.
regards, tom lane
PS: when you generate a diff against a non-clean source tree, please
remove the cruft like
> ? GNUmakefile
>
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 4752
> Logged by: Fujii Masao
> Email address: masao.fu...@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: PostgreSQL 8.4d
> Operating system: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Serv
10 matches
Mail list logo
