"Tony Marston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies" is
> extremely questionable. ... If you support both key and non-key columns on a
> table then you support functional dependencies whether you like it or not.
An ISO/IEC 9075 conformant
Tony Marston wrote:
I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies" is
extremely questionable. A functional dependency in relational theory
automatically exists where a non-key column on a table is functionally
dependent on the key of that table. It is not something that can be
Tony Marston wrote:
> I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies" is
> extremely questionable. A functional dependency in relational theory
> automatically exists where a non-key column on a table is functionally
> dependent on the key of that table. It is not something that c
I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies" is
extremely questionable. A functional dependency in relational theory
automatically exists where a non-key column on a table is functionally
dependent on the key of that table. It is not something that can be turned
on or off with
