On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Craig Ringer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>
> Sorry, I just re-read your mail and noticed you said process monitor, not
> explorer.
I did mean Process Explorer though :-).
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent vi
Craig Ringer wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Craig Ringer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alas, Process Explorer doesn't seem to work on Vista. MS think that
Process
monitor is a replacement, but it lacks all the handy detailed process
introspection, thread control, etc th
Dave Page wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Craig Ringer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alas, Process Explorer doesn't seem to work on Vista. MS think that Process
monitor is a replacement, but it lacks all the handy detailed process
introspection, thread control, etc that Process Explorer ha
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Craig Ringer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alas, Process Explorer doesn't seem to work on Vista. MS think that Process
> monitor is a replacement, but it lacks all the handy detailed process
> introspection, thread control, etc that Process Explorer has.
>
> Frustra
