Hi Tom
> "Rui Martins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My reasoning is:
>> Why would the exact same sub-expression, return different results when
>> either preceded or followed by something.
>
> It *isn't* returning different results; you are testing for different
> things in these two cases, namel
"Rui Martins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But the sub-expression did "match" !
No, the sub-expression "(something)" did not match. What did match
is the larger expression "(something)?". You seem to be failing
to recognize that these are two different things. If you put the
capturing parenthe
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NikhilS escribió:
>> Ok, I understand. But even then this could patch could be considered even if
>> it does not solve the TODO completely, no? It atleast disallows ONLY ADD
>> CONSTRAINT on the parent.
> No, because you would then feel that the TODO it
"Rui Martins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My reasoning is:
> Why would the exact same sub-expression, return different results when
> either preceded or followed by something.
It *isn't* returning different results; you are testing for different
things in these two cases, namely whether there is
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> NikhilS escribió:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > If it's a small patch, it's wrong by definition. AFAICS there is no
> way
> > > to fix this correctly that doesn't
NikhilS escribió:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If it's a small patch, it's wrong by definition. AFAICS there is no way
> > to fix this correctly that doesn't involve catalog changes. The point
> > of the TODO is that you have to enforce that the inh
> "Rui Martins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Even though this can me though as argumentative, think about this
>> expression:
>
>> (something)?
>
>> Will "match" with an empty string in the context of a full expression,
>> and
>> will return an EMPTY String. So by analogy, I would expect it, to r
Sergey Burladyan wrote:
Thursday 20 March 2008 01:16:34 Heikki Linnakangas:
Here's a patch that does the conversion in the other direction as well.
As I'm not too familiar with cyrillic, can you double-check that this
works? I tested it using the convert() function between different
encodings, a
