Laurent Birtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> From the observed sequence of events, it would appear that the event
> thread inserts a tuple in the pg_listener table BEFORE the command thread
> actually commits the transaction. However, when this transaction commits,
> Postgres does not actually find
Hello,
I am wondering if I have encountered a race condition in Postgres that
sometimes cause a notification not to be sent. This post is rather long
since the situation is rather complex and I tried to provide as much
details as possible.
Please note:
I have modified the file src/backend/comm
Madhu... Please please... please use the 'REPLY TO ALL' option in
your mail client.
Forwarding again to the bugs list, in the hopes of pooling in others.
-- Forwarded message --
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 7:02 PM
Subject: RE: [BUGS] pg_ctl problem
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:51 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> thanks for replying
>
> when i run this command i found the error as
>
> pg_ctl reload -l logfile -D /var/lib/pgsql/data
> could not change directory to "/root"
> pg_ctl: PID file "/var/lib/pgsql/data/postmaster.pid" does not exist
>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When running the pg_ctl command i am facing this error
> pg_ctl: no database directory specified and environment variable PGDATA
> unset
> I use other options also but no solution was found.
> could someone help me on this
>
Thats
When running the pg_ctl command i am facing this error
pg_ctl: no database directory specified and environment variable PGDATA unset
I use other options also but no solution was found.
could someone help me on this
Regards
Madhu Harchandani
The information contained in this electronic messa
hi,
when i try silent installation of postgres using the example in
your website msiexec /i postgresql-8.0.0-rc1-int.msi /qr INTERNALLAUNCH=1
ADDLOCAL=server,psql,docs SERVICEDOMAIN="%COMPUTERNAME%"
SERVICEPASSWORD="SecretWindowsPassword123" SUPERPASSWORD="VerySecret"
Not that I know of...the win32 binaries on the PostgreSQL website haven't
been updated, and I haven't seen any other mention of this issue in either
pgsql-general or on this list.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Has this been addressed?
>
>
> -
