Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Those are not comments on the actual patch, of course. For that one, it
> looks to me like it's the wrong fix. I don't think we should be adding
> to shared buffers like that - if somebody asked for a specific value
> they should get that.
Agreed, t
Andreas Kling wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Anybody know *why* Gentoo does such a thing? Having shared buffers at
the very lowest possible boundary just seems counterproductive. Plus,
the normal way to set these things would be in postgresql.conf, why
override them on the commandline?
It's
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Anybody know *why* Gentoo does such a thing? Having shared buffers at
the very lowest possible boundary just seems counterproductive. Plus,
the normal way to set these things would be in postgresql.conf, why
override them on the commandline?
It's not the first time I'v
Andreas Kling wrote:
Greetings,
Starting PostgreSQL 8.3.0 with the default options used by Gentoo Linux
(-N 40 -B 80) causes it to bail with an error message.
"the number of buffers (-B) must be at least twice the number of allowed
connections (-N) and at least 16"
The problem is that NBuf
Greetings,
Starting PostgreSQL 8.3.0 with the default options used by Gentoo Linux
(-N 40 -B 80) causes it to bail with an error message.
"the number of buffers (-B) must be at least twice the number of allowed
connections (-N) and at least 16"
The problem is that NBuffers is actually "max
The gcc 4.2.2 binaries for a number of HP-UX platforms can be
downloaded from here: http://hpux.cs.utah.edu/
And that does the job.
Thanks for pointing to the right direction.
Peter
On Feb 16, 2008 2:49 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Peter Kovacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I
"Peter Kovacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just completed a successful compilation with cc. Still, cc gave a lot
> of
> (Bundled) cc: warning 922: "-Ae" is unsupported in the bundled
> compiler, ignored.
> (Bundled) cc: warning 922: "+O2" is unsupported in the bundled
> compiler, ignored
Thank you, Tom, for you help.
The short gcc test you described gives the result you predicted.
I have just completed a successful compilation with cc. Still, cc gave a lot of
(Bundled) cc: warning 922: "-Ae" is unsupported in the bundled
compiler, ignored.
(Bundled) cc: warning 922: "+O2" is uns
