Re: [BUGS] 8.3b2: problem using "COPY ... TO/FROM .... BINARY"

2007-11-18 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 21:13 +0100, Thomas H. wrote: >>> I'll bet a nickel that you built one version with float timestamps and >>> the other with integer ... >> >> both versions are the official win32 builds from postgresl.org... > That means Tom is r

Re: [BUGS] 8.3b2: problem using "COPY ... TO/FROM .... BINARY"

2007-11-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 21:13 +0100, Thomas H. wrote: > tom lane wrote: > >> i'm not sure it its really a bug - the manual specifies that COPY ... > >> BINARY between different PGSQL versions might be problematic. > > > >> nevertheless: i've imported several tables from 8.2.5 to 8.3b2 without > >

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3750: Invalid frontend message type 112

2007-11-18 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 06:34 +0100, Christian Ullrich wrote: > * Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > Christian Ullrich wrote: > > >> psql tells me about an "invalid frontend message type 112". Most of the > >> time, that error comes as the first line of output from psql (above the > >> "Welcome to" line

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3751: Conversion error using PreparedStatement.setObject()

2007-11-18 Thread Kris Jurka
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Lance J. Andersen wrote: The table in this case that needs to be looked at is B-5, not B-4 which i believe you are referring to. The expectation of setObject(int/String, Object, int) is that you are sending the value to the backend as the SQL Type specified for the 3rd