Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This looks a lot like bug #2829 (excep that one is Windows), as I
> mentioned here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00461.php
> Haven't looked into the actual code, though, but Tom had a suggestion in
> the original bug, but AF
Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, let's be clear: this is entirely the fault of the inet type not
> accepting what we now know to be RFC-compliant address specifications.
> So we ought to put fixing that on the TODO list. It's not happening
> for 8.3 though, let alone in existing release branches, so we'd b
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:39:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It seems the correct solution here is to extend the inet type to support
>> RFC4007 "zone_id" strings. Yech. Not going to happen as a bug fix,
>> but we should probably put it on the TODO li
Added to TODO:
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Is there a TODO here?
>
> Yes, I think so:
>
> * Implement the SQL standard mechanism whereby REVOKE ROLE only revokes
> the privilege as granted b
Added to TODO:
* Fix problem with excessive logging during SSL disconnection
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00122.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-05/msg00065.php
---
Peter Koc
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Is there a TODO here?
Yes, I think so:
* Implement the SQL standard mechanism whereby REVOKE ROLE only revokes
the privilege as granted by the invoking role, and not those granted
by other roles
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPr
Is there a TODO here?
---
Russell Smith wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Russell Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>
> >>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> 2. decide that the sta
Christian Kratzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not that simple though. The ipv6 stack will propably not allow
> users to build sockets from addresses in link local scope from a
> specific interface to a server bound to a global address, ::1, or
> scoped to any other interface. After all li
Christian Kratzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> As a temporary workaround, should we hack the server to suppress any
>> %-foo found in the result of getnameinfo()?
> Not sure what that would buy us.
Mostly, it would buy us not having pg_stat_activity fail c
Srinivas wrote:
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 3288
> Logged by: Srinivas
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.2
> Operating system: Win XP
> Description:Select command giving error
> Details:
>
> Hi, We are using
This looks a lot like bug #2829 (excep that one is Windows), as I
mentioned here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00461.php
Haven't looked into the actual code, though, but Tom had a suggestion in
the original bug, but AFAIK nobody has done that yet (at least not me.:)
//M
Hi,
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
It seems the correct solution here is to extend the inet type to support
RFC4007 "zone_id" strings. Yech. Not going to happen as a bug fix,
but we should probably put it on the TODO list.
propably yes. But we should bear in mind that addresses of dif
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 02:39:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It seems the correct solution here is to extend the inet type to support
> RFC4007 "zone_id" strings. Yech. Not going to happen as a bug fix,
> but we should probably put it on the TODO list.
>
> As a temporary workaround, should we hac
Hi,
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:29:47PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote:
supporting scoped addresses could have their uses but then again
theres nothing stopping you to bind multiple global ipv6 addresses
to your loopback interface which would work fin
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:42:39PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote:
>> of a specific interface. This is why bsd based oprating systems append
>> %ifname to the address so that they know which Interface this address
> Oh, I forgot about that wart in RF
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:29:47PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote:
> supporting scoped addresses could have their uses but then again
> theres nothing stopping you to bind multiple global ipv6 addresses
> to your loopback interface which would work fine for disconnected
> setups and it might be a b
Hi,
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:42:39PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote:
of a specific interface. This is why bsd based oprating systems append
%ifname to the address so that they know which Interface this address
Oh, I forgot about that wart in RFC4
Hi,
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:32:21PM -0600, Brian Hirt wrote:
I have postgresql installed on a mac, and I'm connecting from another
mac on the network using ip6. When I try to select out of
pg_stat_activity
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 06:42:39PM +0200, Christian Kratzer wrote:
> of a specific interface. This is why bsd based oprating systems append
> %ifname to the address so that they know which Interface this address
Oh, I forgot about that wart in RFC4007. Thanks for the cluestick.
> There is prop
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
> Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "delete from foo" fails:
>
> > ERROR: update or delete on table "bar" violates foreign key constraint
> > "foobar_fk0" on table "foobar"
> > SQL state: 23503
> > Detail: Key (bar_id)=(1) is still referenced from table
I didn't see any comment on this. Seems like a problem.
---
Peter Koczan wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 3266
> Logged by: Peter Koczan
> Email address: [EMAIL PR
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:32:21PM -0600, Brian Hirt wrote:
>> I have postgresql installed on a mac, and I'm connecting from another
>> mac on the network using ip6. When I try to select out of
>> pg_stat_activity i get this error. I suspect the
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 08:32:21PM -0600, Brian Hirt wrote:
> I have postgresql installed on a mac, and I'm connecting from another
> mac on the network using ip6. When I try to select out of
> pg_stat_activity i get this error. I suspect the %en0 has something
> to do with the problem, b
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "delete from foo" fails:
> ERROR: update or delete on table "bar" violates foreign key constraint
> "foobar_fk0" on table "foobar"
> SQL state: 23503
> Detail: Key (bar_id)=(1) is still referenced from table "foobar".
> Context: SQL statement "DELETE FROM ONL
Hi!
Suppose the following schema:
create table foo(foo_id integer primary key);
create table bar(bar_id integer primary key, foo_id integer,
constraint bar_fk0 foreign key (foo_id) references foo(foo_id)
on delete cascade);
create table foobar(foobar_id serial primary key, foo_id integer,
Daniel Kastenholz wrote:
Type in SELECT SIN(PI())
Expected output:
0
Actual output:
* Windows, using 8.2.4:
garbage (-2.2..)
* Linux, using 8.1:
garbage (1.22...)
--
Comments:
SIN(3.1414) and SIN(3.1417) come close to 0 and work on both platforms.
SIN(3.1415) and SIN(3.1416) prod
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3289
Logged by: Daniel Kastenholz
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1, 8.2.4
Operating system: Linux, Windows
Description:SIN(PI()) expected to return 0, but returns garbage
Details:
Troub
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3286
Logged by: Aravind C
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.3
Operating system: Windows XP on VMWare
Description:psqlodbc not able to connect
Details:
My Host os is Windows XP with Postg
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3287
Logged by: Siva
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: postgresql-8.1
Operating system: Windows vista
Description:I cann't instal postgres sql in windows vista
Details:
Dear All,
I cann'
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3288
Logged by: Srinivas
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: Win XP
Description:Select command giving error
Details:
Hi, We are using PGOleDB drivers with ASP.Net C# code
Hi,
I´m trying to install pgcluster 1.7 on Aix 5.3 and I´m having problems, when I
run "./configure --enable-thread-safety" I receive the msg bellow and when a
try to do make make install I got a error about libpg
Could someone help me please ?
Thanks in advance
checking for sys/s
31 matches
Mail list logo
