The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 3266
Logged by: Peter Koczan
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4
Operating system: CentOS Linux 4.4 (RHEL 4) running on Pentium 4
Description:SSL broken pipes kill the machine and fill the
John R Pierce wrote:
I just built a version of postgres 8.2.4 on Solaris 10 x86 ... a few
things that could be mentioned in INSTALL, and or in the Solaris notes
Solaris.FAQ is best place for it.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.FAQ_Solaris.html
Solaris has a `crle` command that perfo
Hi, Tom
Thanks for reply
I understood, that this isn't so critical, but may causes surprises, so
I reported for someone pay atention that this can occur.
By the way I try to drop the sequence, but I can't because they still
owned by the column. So I can't be able to remove this
reference with
"Luiz K. Matsumura" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CREATE TABLE teste
> (
>id serial,
>...
> ALTER TABLE teste ALTER COLUMN id DROP DEFAULT;
This isn't supported before 8.2, since as you found out pg_dump is
unable to reproduce the situation in the database --- the sequence is
still marked
Hi,
I found a problem with pg_dump in pg 8.0 and 8.1 ( Postgres 8.2 works
fine)
Scenario 1:
CREATE TABLE teste
(
id serial,
campo character(10),
CONSTRAINT pk_teste PRIMARY KEY (id)
) WITHOUT OIDS;
CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "teste_id_seq" for serial
column "teste.i
I just built a version of postgres 8.2.4 on Solaris 10 x86 ... a few
things that could be mentioned in INSTALL, and or in the Solaris notes
There is a Sun supplied version of gnu readline is on the Solaris
"Companion" DVD as package SFWrline ...
cd /mnt/Solaris_Software_Companion/Solar
Russell Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But this also means that a super user is not really a super user
> anymore. Are we comfortable with this redefinition?
Hm? It has never been the case that a view would act differently for a
superuser than it would when invoked by someone else. The bu
Tom Lane wrote:
"Russell Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CREATE view v1 as select * from t1;
ALTER TABLE v1 OWNER TO "USER";
See thread here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-04/msg01138.php
and patch here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-09/msg
Dear sir,
Is PostgreSQL supported in Vista? If it is, what version is supported?
Thanks & Regards,
Jack
