The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2815
Logged by: mike godshall
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: Windows 2003 webserver edition
Description:Editing / Creating ODBC on Windows fails libintl-2.dll
not foun
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Murali"):
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference: 2810
> Logged by: Murali
> Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4
> Operating system: WINXP
> Description:restore to lower version of dump
> Details:
"Ross Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> PREPARE demo (unknown) AS SELECT 1;
> ERROR: could not determine data type of parameter $1
This doesn't seem like a bug to me. The parser needs to be able to
resolve the types of any unknown parameters, and you've not given it
enough information to do t
Alex Piyevsky wrote:
> We issue a command which drops the existing table and recreates the table
> under the same name, all in one transaction. If the table does not
> previously exist, an error message is returned for the drop command and the
> transaction aborts with the following:
>
> current
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2812
Logged by: Alex Piyevsky
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1
Operating system: Linux Kernel-2.4.21-glibc-2.3.2 x86 32bit
Description:Transaction is aborted after error
Details:
We i
I wrote:
> I can't reproduce it with less than four tables, so it's a pretty
> weird corner case. Apparently there's something wrong with
> distribute_qual_to_rels' logic for determining qual placement, but
> I'm not sure what yet ...
OK, I've localized the problem and been able to reduce it to a
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8.1 this returns 1 record. On 8.2 this returns 10. It appears to
> be applying the filter too soon, and then it does an outer join which
> violates the WHERE.
AFAICS the outer join reordering is perfectly legal --- the problem is
that the WHERE condi
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2809
Logged by: Brien R. Givens
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: Win XP
Description:Incorrect ASP/ADO data types (ODBC Driver)
Details:
Hi,
In ADO, a boolean field is
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2808
Logged by: kindy
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2.0-1
Operating system: Window 2003 Enterprise Edition SP1(CHS)
Description:setup error
Details:
setup log:
The program "postgres" i
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2810
Logged by: Murali
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4
Operating system: WINXP
Description:restore to lower version of dump
Details:
I have taken dump from 8.1.4 postgresql db + win
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2811
Logged by: Ross Cohen
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: linux (fedora core 4, released RPMS)
Description:Error determining param type in prepared statement of
unused
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2807
Logged by: Ross Cohen
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.2
Operating system: linux (fedora core 4, released RPMS)
Description:constraint violation
Details:
This query:
select
phot
Thanks to rcohen on IRC yesterday for pointing this out and providing
his query + EXPLAIN output.
It looks like he still hasn't posted it to -bugs, and I was finally able
to reproduce it in a narrower, self contained test case, so I'm posting
this right now.
On 8.1 this returns 1 record. On 8.2
13 matches
Mail list logo