"Nikolay Samokhvalov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't understand how this can be called "not bug"... Please, help me
> understand it :-)
The situation is that the DELETE arrives at a row after the trigger has
already UPDATEd that row. You could make a reasonable case for throwing
an error i
On 8/2/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Postgres work this way? In the case of 'delete from tbl;' we
have search condition>=TRUE for all rows. If we evaluate it *before*
any other operation, we should mark all rows to be deleted. I guess,
Postgres doesn't follow this logi
"Brian Hurt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The manual page for grant here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-grant.html
> indicates that you can grant a group to public. The discussion of
> priveleges here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/privileges.html
> indic
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Luiz Henrique wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Postgresql 7.3 in Debian Woody OS.
>
> After some time working properly, insert's statements related this error:
>
>
> referential integrity violation - key referenced from xxx not found in yyy
>
>
> This error would be norma
Brian Hurt wrote:
> The manual page for grant here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-grant.html
>
> indicates that you can grant a group to public. The discussion of
> priveleges here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/privileges.html
>
> indicates that
Hi,I'm running Postgresql 7.3 in Debian Woody OS.After some time working properly, insert's statements related this error:referential integrity violation - key referenced from xxx not found in yyy
This error would be normal, if the key really doesn't exist, but the key exist.The insert's wo
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2559
Logged by: flash.xu
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4
Operating system: fc5
Description:why jdbc-driver AbstractJdbc2ResultSetMetaData.
getTableName(int column) return ""
Details:
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2561
Logged by: Brian Hurt
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.01
Operating system: Documentation
Description:Manual is wrong: You can't grant a group to public
Details:
The manual page for
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2560
Logged by: PFudd
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4
Operating system: N/A
Description:Web page documentation hard to use
Details:
I'm trying to look up the SQL keyword 'in' using t
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 2558
Logged by: Dror
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.1.4
Operating system: win 2003
Description:initDB failed to run
Details:
On one of mine win 2003 machine ( on any other win2003 machi
OK, then we should at least forbit making such things... Otherwise, it
seems to be smth like gotcha.
But look at this please:
"12) If is specified, then the is
evaluated for each row of T prior
invocation of any caused by the imminent or actual
deletion of any row of T."
Does Postgres work
11 matches
Mail list logo