Re: [BUGS] right sibling is not next child

2006-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Peter Brant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Also, when I tried to run a database-wide VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE it > actually doesn't even get to Panel and errors out with: > ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint > "pg_statistic_relid_att_index" Hm, my eyebrows just disappeared over the b

Re: [BUGS] right sibling is not next child

2006-04-11 Thread Peter Brant
Also, when I tried to run a database-wide VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE it actually doesn't even get to Panel and errors out with: INFO: analyzing "public.MaintCode" INFO: "MaintCode": scanned 1 of 1 pages, containing 19 live rows and 0 dead rows; 19 rows in sample, 19 estimated total rows ERROR: dupl

Re: [BUGS] right sibling is not next child

2006-04-11 Thread Peter Brant
The index data isn't sensitive, but I should ask for permission nonetheless. I'll send over the '-f' output tomorrow morning. Pete *** * PostgreSQL File/Block Formatted Dump Utility - Version 8.1.1 * * File: 180571 * Options used:

Re: [BUGS] right sibling is not next child

2006-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Peter Brant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I ended up modifying the elog again with the following results: > PANIC: right sibling is not next child in "Panel_pkey", parent is 271, > target is 635, rightsib is 629, nextoffset is 87 OK, so the part of the pg_filedump info we need to see is items 8

Re: [BUGS] right sibling is not next child

2006-04-11 Thread Peter Brant
Try as I might, I wasn't able to get a JIT debugger give me a memory dump. It seems like postgres.exe is not really crashing in the "unhandled exception" sense (see gdb log below)? Am I missing a configure option? (As an aside, what's the best way to get a core dump on Windows? Can gdb read mem

Re: [BUGS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BUG in logs]

2006-04-11 Thread Guillaume Smet
> From: Martin Marques > I encountered a rare BUG in the way PG is logging. Let me first enlight with > some configuration I have and PG version: Perhaps I'm missing something but I think it's not a bug but a configuration problem. > log_min_error_statement| panic If you set this one to e

[BUGS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: BUG in logs]

2006-04-11 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Martín is not subscribed apparently. - Forwarded message from Martin Marques - From: Martin Marques To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:34:43 -0300 Subject: BUG in logs Organization: Cetul - UNL I encountered a rare BUG in the

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2386: pg_restore doesn't restore large objects

2006-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Patrick Headley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Description:pg_restore doesn't restore large objects At no point did you show us exactly what you did or exactly what went wrong, so even though this report has a lot of version-number details, it's just about useless :-(. Please see the rep

Re: [BUGS] problem with kill script

2006-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The INSTALL file mention the command "kill `cat > /usr/local/pgsql/data/postmaster.pid`" but the pid file contain the pid > but not only, it also contain data directory and some numbers (memory > usage ?, database characteristic ?) Hm, I wonder why this docu

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2387: Incorrect sorting of timestamp with time zone

2006-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SELECT time_stamp, time_stamp_with_zone from timetest order by > time_stamp_with_zone; > I get the following result: > time_stamp | time_stamp_with_zone > -+ > 2006-09-23 20:01:00 | 2006-09-23 23:01:00+00 >

[BUGS] problem with kill script

2006-04-11 Thread julien
Hello, I'm posted a short modification of the kill command. The INSTALL file mention the command "kill `cat /usr/local/pgsql/data/postmaster.pid`" but the pid file contain the pid but not only, it also contain data directory and some numbers (memory usage ?, database characteristic ?) So wh

[BUGS] BUG #2386: pg_restore doesn't restore large objects

2006-04-11 Thread Patrick Headley
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2386 Logged by: Patrick Headley Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.0.4 + Operating system: Windows XP Description:pg_restore doesn't restore large objects Details: I have been trying to res

[BUGS] BUG #2388: PostsgreSQL fails under isntallation

2006-04-11 Thread Hugo Quisbert
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2388 Logged by: Hugo Quisbert Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.1 Operating system: Windows XP Description:PostsgreSQL fails under isntallation Details: PostgreSQL do fails under installat

[BUGS] BUG #2387: Incorrect sorting of timestamp with time zone

2006-04-11 Thread
The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2387 Logged by: Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PostgreSQL version: 8.1.3 Operating system: Linux 2.4.22 Description:Incorrect sorting of timestamp with time zone Details: When sorting by "timestamp with tim

[BUGS] set up on flash drive

2006-04-11 Thread Richard Dunne
I have installed PostGreSql on a flash memory drive.  How do I start the shell command? Love cheap thrills? Enjoy PC-to-Phone calls to 30+ countries for just 2¢/min with Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

Re: [BUGS] right sibling is not next child

2006-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Peter Brant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PANIC: right sibling is not next child in "Panel_pkey", parent is 271 Hmm ... that's not actually enough info to tell us where to look, is it :-(. Please add the following variables to the elog message, or gdb for them if you can: target

Re: [BUGS] right sibling is not next child

2006-04-11 Thread Peter Brant
Sorry about the delay in responding. We had a bit of difficulty with the test machine. Kevin is also on vacation this week. The problem is repeatable with a VACUUM. I've found the offending block. A (partial) pg_filedump of that block is pasted in below. I'm a little lost as to what the next

Re: [BUGS] constraints & tableoid [pgsql8.1]

2006-04-11 Thread 姜维
Tom Lane 写道: > Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Apparently a new row's tableoid isn't set until the row is actually >> inserted. >> > > I believe that's true of all the system columns. If you're using oid, > for example, that's not assigned either until heap_insert(). > > This

Re: [BUGS] constraints & tableoid [pgsql8.1]

2006-04-11 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Apparently a new row's tableoid isn't set until the row is actually > inserted. I believe that's true of all the system columns. If you're using oid, for example, that's not assigned either until heap_insert(). This behavior doesn't seem unreasonable to

Re: [BUGS] constraints & tableoid [pgsql8.1]

2006-04-11 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 03:11:46PM +0800, ??? ??? wrote: > jw=# CREATE TABLE base ( CHECK (tableoid = 'base'::regclass) ); > CREATE TABLE > jw=# \d base > Table "public.base" > Column | Type | Modifiers > +--+--- > Check constraints: > "base_tableoid_check" CHECK (table

Re: [BUGS] constraints & tableoid [pgsql8.1]

2006-04-11 Thread Richard Huxton
维 姜 wrote: jw=# CREATE TABLE base ( CHECK (tableoid = 'base'::regclass) ); CREATE TABLE jw=# \d base Table "public.base" Column | Type | Modifiers +--+--- Check constraints: "base_tableoid_check" CHECK (tableoid = 'base'::regclass::oid) jw=# INSERT INTO base DEFAULT

[BUGS] constraints & tableoid [pgsql8.1]

2006-04-11 Thread 维 姜
jw=# CREATE TABLE base ( CHECK (tableoid = 'base'::regclass) ); CREATE TABLE jw=# \d base Table "public.base" Column | Type | Modifiers +--+--- Check constraints: "base_tableoid_check" CHECK (tableoid = 'base'::regclass::oid) jw=# INSERT INTO base DEFAULT VALUES ; ERRO