Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least the certificate could be permitted to be owned/in group root.
> I cannot see how this should weaken the certificate's security.
Postgres doesn't run as root, hence could not use such a certificate
unless it was world-readable.
Or should I infer f
Hi Tom!
Tom Lane [2005-10-14 11:38 -0400]:
> "Martin Pitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Currently the postmaster requires the private SSL key file to have the same
> > owner as the postmaster, and no permissions for group and others. However,
> > this is too strict to sensibly use the certifica
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1968
Logged by: Jorge Mario Valencia
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.4
Operating system: Windows
Description:bad end of file
Details:
When i download the file, this one cannot be unzip
The customer I am writing this for will only accept it based on released
code. That means I run either 8.0.3 or 8.0.4.
Chuck
Michael Meskes wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:18:13AM -0500, C Wegrzyn wrote:
>
>
>> Yes I found out the same thing. Unfortunately it isn't quite that
>>simple for m
On 10/14/2005 09:30:51 AM, Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:51:15PM +, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> I definately do not recall catching any additional errors at
> compile time as part of the switch to 8.
8.0's syntax checking is minimal; 8.1's will be better.
Looking forward to
