On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 12:26:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Could this be another "depends on the junk on your stack" bug?
>
> Looks that way --- but I've still had no success in reproducing it,
> either on x86/Linux or PPC/Darwin. Anyone have some var
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 08:01:11AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > When using the following SQL statement the result of a 8.0.3 seems to be
> > wrong.
> >
> > Statement: "select to_char(interval '15h 2m 12s', 'MMDD HH24:MI:SS')"
> > Result of a 8.0.3: "0001 1
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Could this be another "depends on the junk on your stack" bug?
Looks that way --- but I've still had no success in reproducing it,
either on x86/Linux or PPC/Darwin. Anyone have some variant test
cases?
regards, tom lane
---
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:49:11PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > ERROR: error from Perl function: creation of Perl function failed:
> > > (in cleanup) Undefined subroutine &m
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ERROR: error from Perl function: creation of Perl function failed:
> > (in cleanup) Undefined subroutine &main::mksafefunc called at (eval 4) line
> > 2. at (eval 4) line 2.
>
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ERROR: error from Perl function: creation of Perl function failed:
> (in cleanup) Undefined subroutine &main::mksafefunc called at (eval 4) line
> 2. at (eval 4) line 2.
I could not duplicate this in either 8.0 or HEAD branches. It looks
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1831
Logged by: Greg Sabino Mullane
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.3
Operating system: Linux
Description:plperl gives error after reconnect.
Details:
Tested on 8.0.1 and in current cv
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:22:16 +0100,
Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
This isn't a bug and you really should have asked this question on
another list. I am moving the discussion over to the general list.
>
> Bug reference: 1830
> Logged
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1830
Logged by: Bernard
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.3
Operating system: Linux RedHat 9
Description:Non-super-user must be able to copy from a file
Details:
On the attempt to bulk l
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1829
Logged by: Lee Hyun soon
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.2
Operating system: Windows XP Professional SP1
Description:pgsql odbc & ADO.NET(modify)
Details:
[sorry miss type long,,,
10 matches
Mail list logo