Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not set on it --- fix it as you suggested.
Attached is a patch that implements this. I'm not especially happy about
the implementation: defining _two_ local macros (that both
doubly-evaluate one of their arguments) is pretty ugly, but I didn't see
a cleaner alternative --
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any thoughts on this, Tom? If you're planning on doing the rewrite you
> described, that's fine; alternatively I'm happy to implement the fix
> that I described above.
I'm not set on it --- fix it as you suggested.
regards, tom l
Neil Conway wrote:
I think we _can_ do it that way, it's just a question of whether that is
the best approach. I think the solution I outlined before would work
fine: pass the length of the working buffer to ParseDateTime(), and
reject the input only if the parsing process actually requires mor
"Julien Vallet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The result is "ERROR: UNION types text and bigint cannot be matched"
This is the identical issue reported here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-02/msg8.php
See also this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-02/m
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1677
Logged by: Julien Vallet
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0 & 8.0.3
Operating system: Windows XP
Description:Bug in select with Union
Details:
I think there is a problem with the sel
On 2005-05-21, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 2005-05-21, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> initdb does not use libpq ... it might link to it,
>
>> Linking to it is enough to bring in libc_r, and pick up libc_r's versions
>> of at le
