Craig Ruff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have an annoying problem with some kind of a hang or deadlock triggered
> sometimes when running a vacuum on a table with a pair of read only
> cursors enumerating different subsets of rows of the same table.
I believe that if VACUUM wants to delete a tup
Tom Lane wrote:
! maskl = (0xUL << (32 - (int)
bits))
! & 0xUL;
Is that "& 0xUL" required ?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze i
I have an annoying problem with some kind of a hang or deadlock triggered
sometimes when running a vacuum on a table with a pair of read only
cursors enumerating different subsets of rows of the same table.
(Originally, I also could have other queries that modified the table
running concurrently, b
Dear Tom,
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 5:02 PM
> SIGTERM on individual backends is not recommended or supported.
That explains this. Keeping this policy in mind, I wouldn't qualify this as
a bug after all.
> FWIW, though, I
> Greetings.
> recently i downloaded the postgres version for windows, but
> after i installed it in my server, i get the following error:
> "server closed the connection unexpectedly this probably
> means the server terminated abnormally before or while
> processing the request"
>
> can you he
