"Rodrigo Ferraz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello !
>
> My english is very bad.
>
> For instalation Postgres beta 8.0 in the Windows 2k Server, he is Controler
> Domain. Is not have account local !!!
>
> Please, Thank you...
If you write in Portuguese I can help translating to English.
Hello !
My english is very bad.
For instalation Postgres beta 8.0 in the Windows 2k
Server, he is Controler Domain. Is not have account local !!!
Please, Thank you...
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1291
Logged by: Alexander Kirpa
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 8.0 Beta
Operating system: FreeBSD 5.2.1current
Description:Bug during processing string
Details:
PostgreSQL 8.0beta3
D
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Would it be possible to check the compatibility of a default value for
> > the associated column?
>
> I think that would introduce as many problems as it would fix. AFAICS
> the only way to make such a check is to evaluate the expression and see
> what ha
Troels Arvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:07:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm. What's going on here is that the stored default expression is
>> actually of the form
>> ('TODO'::varchar)::varchar(2)
> Would it be possible to check the compatibility of a default value for
>
thank you for your attention
kris, i'll keep the patch but i won't patch my pgsql because i cannot
tell my "customers" (it's a OS program; if it will run ok, maybe my
company will switch from mssql to pgsql) to patch their pgsql installation.
i look forward for the final release of pgsql 8 and o
