Jorge Godoy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I was trying to check some permissions on functions and then I noticed
> that there's no command in psql to show that information. I've tried
> using "\z", "\df" and "\df+" without success on PostgreSQL 7.4.5.
>
> It would be an interesting addition to have tha
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 07:35:58PM -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> testbase=# SELECT proacl, proargtypes FROM pg_proc WHERE proname='to_ascii';
> proacl | proargtypes
> ---+-
> {=X/postgres} | 25
> {=X/postgres} | 25 19
> {=X/postgres} | 25 23
>
Guy Thornley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Postgres 7.4.1. (Yes I know, we _should_ upgrade).
Yup.
> As the subject says, it is spinning at 99% CPU. ...
> This backend has recently lost its client connection, ...
> You can even have a backtrace, how about that:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0
First, I better let you know that we have an in-house patch already on our
postgres, so this may be our breakage. It only started happening recently,
though, and our patch is quite old, so it is very unlikely.
I thought I'd ask here anyway, incase this was a known bug that was fixed
already. I cou
"John R Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I was trying to check some permissions on functions and then I noticed
>> that there's no command in psql to show that information. I've tried
>> using "\z", "\df" and "\df+" without success on PostgreSQL 7.4.5.
>> It would be an interesting addition
I was trying to check some permissions on functions and then I noticed
that there's no command in psql to show that information. I've tried
using "\z", "\df" and "\df+" without success on PostgreSQL 7.4.5.
It would be an interesting addition to have that, as we do have the
commands to show permiss
>> You need two accounts. One administrator account that starts the
>> installer (this could be "Administrator" or cours e-
>definitly no need
>> to create a special user for this). Another account which is
>> used to run
>> the eventual installed postgres. This is the account that you
>> specif
>> Maybe you're right that there's something installed on my
>computer that's
>> bugging the postmaster. The only networking tool that I have
>installed is
>> NetLimiter
>
>This is a good example of a misleading error message, probably
>resulting
>from examining errno. Using GetLastError() on t
Hi,
I was trying to check some permissions on functions and then I noticed
that there's no command in psql to show that information. I've tried
using "\z", "\df" and "\df+" without success on PostgreSQL 7.4.5.
It would be an interesting addition to have that, as we do have the
commands to show
Kouber Saparev wrote:
This sounds a lot like FAQ item 3.2 on
http://pginstaller.projects.postgresql.org/FAQ_windows.html. Check those
instructions as a first step.
Maybe you're right that there's something installed on my computer that's
bugging the postmaster. The only networking tool that I have
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >Firstly, I couldn't install postgresql as a Windows service
> >using the installer - using the installer, I couldn't add
> >postgresql as a Windows service without being a local
> >administrator. However, if I was logged on as a local admin
> >then the service would i
> This sounds a lot like FAQ item 3.2 on
> http://pginstaller.projects.postgresql.org/FAQ_windows.html. Check those
> instructions as a first step.
Maybe you're right that there's something installed on my computer that's
bugging the postmaster. The only networking tool that I have installed is
Ne
The following bug has been logged online:
Bug reference: 1260
Logged by: Blazej
Email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PostgreSQL version: 7.4.3
Operating system: Red Hat 9.0 (without updates)
Description:standard compilation
Details:
Posiible bug in contrib/intarray
Karel Zak wrote:
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 08:36 +, Andreas Pflug wrote:
Karel Zak wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I want to rewrite it for 8.1 as numeric based datetype with some
formatting extension probably with some internal stuff from to_char()
familly.
How about a t
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 08:36 +, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Karel Zak wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
>
> > I want to rewrite it for 8.1 as numeric based datetype with some
> > formatting extension probably with some internal stuff from to_char()
> > familly.
>
>
> > This sounds a lot like FAQ item 3.2 on
> > http://pginstaller.projects.postgresql.org/FAQ_windows.html. Check
> > those instructions as a first step.
>
> Maybe you're right that there's something installed on my
> computer that's bugging the postmaster. The only networking
> tool that I ha
Karel Zak wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I want to rewrite it for 8.1 as numeric based datetype with some
formatting extension probably with some internal stuff from to_char()
familly.
How about a type that is also able to hold an ISO currency identifier?
After a long p
On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 15:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Pardon me if this is redundant, but I've just noticed that the MONEY type
> > still exists in 8.0b2.Didn't we say that we were getting rid of it?
>
> No, we never actually said we would get rid of
18 matches
Mail list logo
