Tom Lane wrote:
> Fabien COELHO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, if I issue a "REVOKE" and the rights are not revoked and could never
> > have been because I have no right to issue such statement on the object, I
> > tend to call this deep absence of success a "failure".
>
> > If I do the ver
Hi,
i installed Postrgersql 7.5 Win version and postmaster
gives me the following error:
unknown option -- t
WindowsXP Prof
Regards,
tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi again!
Sorry for crossposting, but I sent the initial post also to -bugs,
because I did not get an answer on -odbc.
On 2004-05-11 12:03 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I noticed Apache segfaulting when I feed a simple form with long inputs:
>
> [Tue May 4 11:32:10 2004] [notice] child pid
We have already fixed this in CVS and the fix will be in 7.5:
revision 1.107
date: 2004/02/23 20:45:59; author: tgl; state: Exp; lines: +145 -88
Do a direct probe during postmaster startup to determine the maximum
number of openable files and the number
Hi!
On 2004-05-17 8:37 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The issue is that bytea needs double-backslashes because single
> backslashes are processed by the parser into strings:
Indeed. Thank you for this!
Martin
--
Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi PostgreSQL hackers!
>
> We recently got the Debian bug report below. Does anybody have an idea about that?
>
> Thanks and have a nice day!
>
> if i issue the following query:
> $ select decode(encode('\001\000\001'::bytea,'hex'),'hex');
> the result will always be '\001' a
Hi PostgreSQL developers!
Jacek Drobiecki recently sent me a patch which stops postgresql to
actively violate the system limit of maximum open files
(RLIMIT_NOFILE) in src/backend/storage/file/fd.c, function
count_usable_fds().
This avoids irritating kernel logs (if system overstep violations ar
Hi PostgreSQL hackers!
We recently got the Debian bug report below. Does anybody have an idea about that?
Thanks and have a nice day!
Martin
- Forwarded message from Peter Schueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#249036: postgresql: zero bytes cannot be entered in string
litera
> I don't see any bug here; it's just that CHECK constraints are applied
> after any BEFORE triggers are run. Since the triggers could change the
> data to be inserted, the reverse order would be insecure.
Ups, it did make some false assumptions.
Thank you for the clarification.
If I understo
